![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Section on Bibliography Newsletter
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bohdana Stoklasova | Talbott Huey |
| Chair | Secretary |
|
Date |
Time |
Session |
|
Saturday, 17 August |
8.30-11.20 |
SC Meeting I |
|
Tuesday, 20 August |
11.15-13.45 |
Bibliographic Control (Division IV) Open Forum : Update session on Division activities |
|
Wednesday, 21 August |
14.00-16.30 |
Bibliography and National Libraries - Open Session : Bridging the gap between the publishing industry and national bibliographies |
|
Thursday, 22 August |
8.30-12.00 |
Bibliography and National Libraries Workshop Bibliographic control or chaos? |
|
Friday, 23 August |
8.00-10.00 |
SC Meeting II |
IFLA Division IV Open Forum
|
1. Main activities and plans of the Section on Bibliography – a Brief Summary (Bohdana Stoklasova) |
![]() |
|
2. Encouraging co-operation between the publishing industry and national bibliographic agencies in the production of national biblographies. Introducing the Open Session (Talbott Huey) |
|
3. Bibliographic control or chaos? Introducing the Workshop (Kirsten Waneck) |
![]() |
![]() |
4. Disseminating the ICNBS recommendations, projects and survey results to the national bibliographic agencies. Introducing activities and plans of the working group (Unni Knutsen) |
Bridging the gap between the publishing industry and national bibliographies
Bibliography and National Libraries Open Session
In 1996 the Section on Bibliography conducted a survey of national bibliographic agencies (NBAs) to gain basic information on the relationships these organizations have with the "book trade" (i.e., publishers and in some cases dealers) in their nations. A major conclusion of the survey was that the NBAs sometimes saw problems in the relationships and wanted closer cooperation with the publishing industry to improve the scope and quality of national bibliographies.
Since then the Section on Bibliography has begun to devise and implement a program to bring these two "forces" closer together. Two recent reports, one by Barbara Bell and Anne Langballe, and the other by Unni Knutsen, have provided new information on the subject and are now posted on IFLA's website (http:http://www.ifla.org/VII/s12/sb.htm).
The Glasgow conference provides the opportunity for the Section to take the next step; that is, to bring representatives of both the publishing industry and the national libraries together in a single forum. With the joint sponsorship of the Section on National Libraries, the Section will present an open session to examine experiences, problems and possible new directions, on Wednesday, August 21, at 2 PM (Session 140).
The speakers represent a variety of viewpoints.
Please find the full conference programme at: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla68/prog02.htm140. Bibliography and National Libraries
Bridging the gap between the publishing industry and national bibliographies
Chair, Talbott Huey, Michigan State University Libraries; Secretary, Section on Bibliography
Bibliographic control or chaos? How to treat remote electronic resources in
national bibliographies
At the Section on Bibliography’s open meeting at the IFLA conference in Boston, Michael Gorman presented a paper with the title “Bibliographic control or chaos: an agenda for national bibliographic services in the 21st century.” At the same conference, at the Section’s workshop (held jointly with the Section on National Libraries), Marcelle Beaudiquez gave a paper titled “Which usefulness for national bibliographies in the future?” In the paper she also treated the challenges for the national bibliographic agencies and for national bibliographies caused by net publications, and suggested the Section on Bibliography and the Section on National Libraries take up this challenge.
This is what the Section on Bibliography and the Section on National Libraries have done in arranging this joint workshop at the Glasgow Conference. We have borrowed (with his permission) the title of the workshop from Michael Gorman’s Boston paper.
It is evident that a major challenge for the National Bibliographic Agencies in the 21st century will be how to set the agenda for treating remote electronic resources. Likewise it is evident and essential that the challenges of treating electronic resources should be discussed widely and that experiences should be exchanged and best practices presented.
The emphasis of the workshop will be on the bibliographic part, not on legal deposit and copyright matters, as these are being treated in another half-day workshop arranged by the Section on National Libraries. The workshop will present a general overview of the topic and a number of presentations of projects and best practice in Europe, Australia, Russia and the U.S. The presentations cover general and strategic approaches to the subject as well as practical approaches.
Speakers at the workshop are:
John Byrum, Library of Congress |
![]() |
![]() Elena Zhabko, National Library of Russia |
|
Pam Gatenby, National Library of Australia (co-author on the paper is Peter
Haddad) |
![]() |
Randi Diget Hansen, The Danish Bibliographic Centre
A multifaceted strategy for a National Bibliography of electronic resources.
![]() Stina Degerstedt, The Royal Library in Sweden |
Robert Smith, The British Library
The European Library Project: Managing bibliographic standards at the
European level.
Chair of the workshop:
Kirsten Waneck, The Danish Bibliographic Centre, Information Coordinator in Section on Bibliography.
The workshop takes place Thursday morning (meeting 152) 8.30-12.00. Pre-registration is not required. We expect there will be room for 50-70 participants. Workshop papers will not be available in the workshop rooms, but will be posted on IFLANET and will be available from the paper-handling centre.
We hope to see many of the Section’s members at what we believe to be an interesting and relevant workshop.
Kirsten Waneck
152. Bibliography and National Libraries Workshop
Bibliographic Control or Chaos? How to treat remote electronic resources in the (National) Bibliographies.
Other activities of the Section to be discussed and presented in Glasgow
In 2001 two reports initiated by the Section on Bibliography were presented and approved at the Boston conference. The first report, by Barbara Bell and Annema Langballe, analysed the current national bibliographies of the world in relation to how they meet the criteria of the ICNBS (International Conference on National Bibliographic Services) recommendations 5-11. This report particularly deals with the formal document descriptions included in the national bibliographies and with the formal presentation of each bibliography itself, and its timeliness and distribution.
The second report, by Unni Knutsen, is a follow-up on a study conducted by Robert Holley in 1996. The Knutsen report describes the changes that have taken place during the years 1996-2000 in terms of bibliographic control, legal deposit, content and format of the national bibliographies and anticipated changes for the coming years.
At the Section meeting it was decided to form a working group to discuss how to actively publicize and disseminate to National Bibliographic Agencies (NBAs) and others the two reports. The working group (Marcelle Beaudiquez, Unni Knutsen, Whitney Coe and Kirsten Waneck) decided that the two reports should appear on the Section's home page, which they now do. In addition a letter will be sent to NBAs worldwide referring to the ICNBS recommendations and to the reports. We hope that this measure may increase the interest in bibliographic control and the making of national bibliographies.
Unni Knutsen
All the activities mentioned above are connected to our Strategic Plan. The experiences of some countries involving the subjects covered by the Workshop and the Open Session will be presented in Glasgow. However, it would be useful to have at least some short description of the situation in other areas from more members of our Section. This will give us a more comprehensive picture and also a better background for the discussion. Of course, the description of any “national highlights” connected with national bibliography is also welcome, but we should concentrate mainly on the subjects selected for the particular conference. And, of course, it would be great to have these contributions available in the Newsletter in advance. So let me remind you of the topics we have pre-selected for action and presentation in Berlin; I have extracted them from both our Strategic Plan (those not covered by the Glasgow conference and connected activities) and the Boston Minutes.
Please, pay attention to those activities and start thinking about your possible contribution either to the Berlin conference program or to the Newsletter. While we cannot cover everything, the selection for Berlin will be one of our main topics for discussion. The chief candidates for Berlin would seem at this time to be:
Bibliography Section: 2001-2003